Back to claim
SourceThe cases citing it, and what each argues, are listed below.

Thaler v. Perlmutter — district court opinion

US District Court, District of ColumbiaNot provided
Source type
Government Source
Published
Not provided
Added by
DiutoKoinovera team
Added
6 Oct 2026

Contributor evidence

What this source establishes

The court upheld refusal to register a work represented as autonomously computer-generated. Direct application of the human-authorship requirement.

Limitations

Primary court document hosted by Justia; specific registration record, not every AI-assisted case.

AI evidence analysis

Koinovera could not retrieve this page directly, so AI analysis uses a copy saved by the Internet Archive on 12 Oct 2023. The page may have changed since. View the archived copy

Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.

Sign in to analyse evidence

How readers rated this source

These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.

No one has rated this source yet.

Sign in to rate this source
Open source

Share source

Anyone with the link can read this page. They do not need an account.

Cited in

A source does not take a side by itself. These are the cases that use it, and what each argues.

Loading the cases that cite this source…

Review notes

Short, specific corrections about this source itself. They show wherever the source is cited.

Sign in to add note

Loading review notes…

Gathering the latest community-submitted evidence.