SourceThe cases citing it, and what each argues, are listed below.
Thaler v. Perlmutter — appellate opinion
US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit1 Jan 2025
- Source type
- Government Source
- Published
- 1 Jan 2025
- Added by
- DiutoKoinovera team
- Added
- 6 Oct 2026
Contributor evidence
What this source establishes
The appellate court affirmed that eligible authors under the Copyright Act must be human. Strengthens the legal basis for the narrowed claim.
Limitations
Primary opinion hosted by FindLaw; same litigation as the district decision.
AI evidence analysis
Koinovera could not retrieve this page directly, so AI analysis uses a copy saved by the Internet Archive on 19 Apr 2025. The page may have changed since. View the archived copy
Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.
Sign in to analyse evidenceHow readers rated this source
These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.
No one has rated this source yet.
Sign in to rate this source