Back to claim
SourceThe cases citing it, and what each argues, are listed below.

Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models

arXiv.org6 Oct 2026
Source type
Academic Paper
Published
6 Oct 2026
Added by
IKECHUKWUKoinovera team
Added
6 Oct 2026

Contributor evidence

What this source establishes

Tests on verifiable US legal questions found frequent incorrect and invented legal claims. Shows citation-like factual failures in a high-stakes domain.

Limitations

Legal hallucinations include more than fabricated citations; task mix affects rates.

AI evidence analysis

Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.

Sign in to analyse evidence

How readers rated this source

These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.

No one has rated this source yet.

Sign in to rate this source
Open source

Share source

Anyone with the link can read this page. They do not need an account.

Cited in

A source does not take a side by itself. These are the cases that use it, and what each argues.

Loading the cases that cite this source…

Review notes

Short, specific corrections about this source itself. They show wherever the source is cited.

Sign in to add note

Loading review notes…

Gathering the latest community-submitted evidence.