Back to claim
SourceThe cases citing it, and what each argues, are listed below.

Security Weaknesses of Copilot-Generated Code in GitHub Projects: An Empirical Study

arXiv.org6 Feb 2025
Source type
Academic Paper
Published
6 Feb 2025
Added by
PsamiKoinovera team
Added
5 Oct 2026

Contributor evidence

What this source establishes

The source shows that an analysis of Copilot-generated snippets found in public GitHub projects identified security weaknesses in a substantial share, across dozens of weakness types.

Supporting excerpt

Our analysis identified 733 snippets, revealing a high likelihood of security weaknesses, with 29.5% of Python and 24.2% of JavaScript snippets affected.

AI evidence analysis

Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.

Sign in to analyse evidence

How readers rated this source

These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.

No one has rated this source yet.

Sign in to rate this source
Open source

Share source

Anyone with the link can read this page. They do not need an account.

Cited in

A source does not take a side by itself. These are the cases that use it, and what each argues.

Loading the cases that cite this source…

Review notes

Short, specific corrections about this source itself. They show wherever the source is cited.

Sign in to add note

Loading review notes…

Gathering the latest community-submitted evidence.