Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study
- Source type
- Academic Paper
- Published
- 6 Oct 2026
- Added by
- IKECHUKWUKoinovera team
- Added
- 6 Oct 2026
Contributor evidence
What this source establishes
The study claims that AI can perform mammography screening at least as effectively as a second radiologist in detecting breast cancer. This is because one radiologist supported by AI detected 261 cancers compared with 250 detected by two radiologists, producing a 4% higher non-inferior cancer detection rate.
Limitations
One site and one AI product; part-funded by the product's maker.
Supporting excerpt
Findings From April 1, 2021, to June 9, 2022, 58 344 women aged 40–74 years underwent regular mammography screening, of whom 55 581 were included in the study. 269 (0·5%) women were diagnosed with screen-detected breast cancer based on an initial positive read: double reading by one radiologist plus AI was non-inferior for cancer detection compared with double reading by two radiologists (261 [0·5%] vs 250 [0·4%] detected cases; relative proportion 1·04 [95% CI 1·00–1·09]). Single reading by AI (246 [0·4%] vs 250 [0·4%] detected cases; relative proportion 0·98 [0·93–1·04]) and triple reading by two radiologists plus AI (269 [0·5%] vs 250 [0·4%] detected cases; relative proportion 1·08 [1·04–1·11]) were also non-inferior to double reading by two radiologists.
AI evidence analysis
Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.
Koinovera could not read this source.
We couldn't reliably identify the article content.
AI analysis can use the excerpt the contributor provided instead.
How readers rated this source
These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.
No one has rated this source yet.
Sign in to rate this source