SourceThe cases citing it, and what each argues, are listed below.
Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening - Nature Medicine
Nature6 Oct 2026
- Source type
- Academic Paper
- Published
- 6 Oct 2026
- Added by
- IKECHUKWUKoinovera team
- Added
- 6 Oct 2026
Contributor evidence
What this source establishes
The large German PRAIM implementation found higher cancer detection with AI-supported reading. Provides evidence beyond the Swedish trial.
Limitations
Observational implementation; reader selection and confounding remain possible.
Supporting excerpt
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) in mammography screening has shown promise in retrospective evaluations, but few prospective studies exist. PRAIM is an observational, multicenter, real-world, noninferiority, implementation study comparing the performance of AI-supported double reading to standard double reading (without AI) among women (50–69 years old) undergoing organized mammography screening at 12 sites in Germany. Radiologists in this study voluntarily chose whether to use the AI system. From July 2021 to February 2023, a total of 463,094 women were screened (260,739 with AI support) by 119 radiologists. Radiologists in the AI-supported screening group achieved a breast cancer detection rate of 6.7 per 1,000, which was 17.6% (95% confidence interval: +5.7%, +30.8%) higher than and statistically superior to the rate (5.7 per 1,000) achieved in the control group. The recall rate in the AI group was 37.4 per 1,000, which was lower than and noninferior to that (38.3 per 1,000) in the control group (percentage difference: −2.5% (−6.5%, +1.7%)). The positive predictive value (PPV) of recall was 17.9% in the AI group compared to 14.9% in the control group. The PPV of biopsy was 64.5% in the AI group versus 59.2% in the control group. Compared to standard double reading, AI-supported double reading was associated with a higher breast cancer detection rate without negatively affecting the recall rate, strongly indicating that AI can improve mammography screening metrics.
AI evidence analysis
Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.
Sign in to analyse evidenceHow readers rated this source
These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.
No one has rated this source yet.
Sign in to rate this source