Large Language Model Influence on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Source type
- Article
- Published
- Not provided
- Added by
- Chibuike OwhondahKoinovera team
- Added
- 5 Oct 2026
Contributor evidence
What this source establishes
In a small randomized trial of 50 physicians in JAMA Network Open, ChatGPT Plus alone, given the case studies, reached an accuracy of more than 92%. Doctors using ChatGPT were accurate about 76% of the time, against about 74% for doctors without it. A retrospective study of 120 Intensive Care Unit admissions found diagnostic accuracy of 88.3% for physicians and 85.0% for ChatGPT-4, with no significant difference. A study of probabilistic reasoning found that when test results were positive, the chatbot's accuracy was comparable to clinicians in most cases.
AI evidence analysis
Koinovera can compare extracted source evidence against this claim. The result is advisory and may be wrong.
Sign in to analyse evidenceHow readers rated this source
These rate the source itself, wherever it is cited. The reasoning built on it is rated on each case.
No one has rated this source yet.
Sign in to rate this source